Episode IV and Episode III are not quite bookends in my life, but they're not far off. I was eleven when Star Wars came out, back before it was a franchise; my son is eight now, and saw Revenge of the Sith with me tonight. I told him afterward how much I wanted to be eight, or eleven, again, so that I could see this "episode" with the same easy suspension of disbelief that I'd been able to conjure up for the first/fourth "episode." (Obviously I didn't tell him the last clause of that sentence.)
Some random thoughts first:
- It's surprising how many worlds in that galaxy far, far away can sustain abundant life without so much as an acre of arable land.
- Hayden Christensen's eyebrows must have won him the role of Anakin. The eyebrows go a long way toward the whole "journey to the Dark Side" thing. And he's cute too, which helps in the tragedian sense.
- Padme must have had a line on some incredible skin care products; not only has she not aged a day since she first met Anakin back when he was, what, seven years old [Update: nine] - but even when confronted with the knowledge that her beloved husband has embraced Evil, her lip gloss is noteworthily perfect.
- Pregnant women long ago and far, far away obviously carried their unborn children either in a space warp of some kind or in checked luggage, based on Padme's delivery of twins the size of two-month-olds after having had such a tiny belly just the previous day that, from a distance, I thought the continuity people had messed up and forgotten to fit her with a belly at all. She was mighty light on her feet at that point, too.
- If I were a Jedi, I think I would have led the charge to change the uniform. Flowing robes look cool but would undoubtedly twist around your lightsaber arm or flop over your face at the wrong moment in a pitched acrobatic battle.
- But they do look cool, and on just about everyone. I want a cloak just like Obi-Wan's and Anakin's. The fabric, sadly, doesn't seem to hold up as well as the alloys that went into C3PO and R2D2, based on Ben Kenobi's disreputable appearance on Tatooine some eighteen years later. Possibly, though, he had to scrub it on rocks, which would take a toll on even the sturdiest material. [Update: And, come to think of it, Tatooine took a heck of a toll on Kenobi himself, didn't it?]
- Everyone seemed really to enjoy hand-to-hand combat in this movie; every lightsaber battle involved smiles and laughter - admittedly a lot of it sinister, but Kenobi's grins caught the light in each fight scene I can recall.
- Sword-fighting is hot, especially if you're good at it. Think of Inigo Montoya, of Daniel Day Lewis in Last of the Mohicans (who also showed the S.A. factor of long rifles), of Carey Elwes in both Princess Bride and, more so believe it or not, Robin Hood: Men In Tights. (Don't take my word for it - watch him.) Anakin and Obi-Wan, being the best sword-fighters in the piece (since the older Force-users tend to do more "send the Force toward the opponent with a rigid claw-like hand" maneuvers), clearly had training in both grace and deportment, and also in exhibiting an economy of movement bespeaking Utter Confidence and Total Competence. Whoo-ee!
- Was that really Jimmy Smits? Huh. Jimmy Smits. Whaddaya know.
- Mark Hamill wasn't all that bad, on balance - better in V than in IV, kind of odd in VI. Carrie Fisher was fine once she lost the accent with which she did the first fifteen minutes of IV. Hayden Christensen seemed to improve over the course of III's two hours, I think primarily because he had fewer quips and more eyebrow-work to deliver toward the end.
On to the substance of my comments: The first half hour or so of Sith had me alternately rolling my eyes and laughing out loud, but at some point after that I got in touch with my Greek tragedy side and realized that there was actually something very classical about this movie. (I'll resist calling it a "film" - Star Wars, never to be known as A New Hope no matter what kids today think, wasn't a "film" and no other movie in the series ought to claim that moniker lest it be seen as a social climber.) Here I shall announce -
***SPOILER ALERT!!! SPOILER ALERT!!! SPOILER ALERT!!!***
...although anyone who cares at all can figure out the way things have to happen in III in order to make IV, V, and VI possible. So. Greek tragedy. There is a love affair, destined to end in death: the "best" possible death, too, for a tragedy - death in childbirth. There is a flawed hero, his pride and impetuousness destined to lead to his downfall. There is a prophecy, destined to be fulfilled by the flawed hero, who does eventually fulfill it but not... just... yet. There are demigods whose behavior is more noble than that of the gods, who - in this version - are almost all amoral and sinister. There is a terrible bargain, which draws our hero down the slippery slope of evil, his pride allowing him to believe that he'll be able to stop before he falls into the pit at its end.
Folks, it wasn't bad.
Episode III had to do three things. First, it had to explain all the loose-hanging plot points from IV, V, and VI. Check. Second, it had to have a story of its own. Check, though it was a bit of a stretch at the beginning. Third, and most importantly, it had to provide a credible reason for Anakin's transformation into Vader, along with a believable sequence of events carrying him through it. By resorting to the classical approach, Lucas actually pulled it off: the combination of love, a prescient vision of death, and a deal with the Devil to hold that death at bay - well, it worked for Frank Herbert in the second of the Dune trilogy, though he forced his hero to be heroic rather than flawed, and allow his love to die. In fact, it works every time, as a concept.
As screenwriting and acting, maybe not so much. I haven't seen Episode II (but I will now, just to complete the cycle); I understand the "love affair" between Padme and Anakin is not exactly Romeo and Juliet, or even Maddy Hayes and whatsisname on "Moonlighting." Knowing that the suspension of disbelief over that plot device alone was a big problem for many watchers, I was predisposed not to believe it too readily in this movie - and Natalie and Hayden didn't give me a lot of reason to change my mind. Still. Once I made up my mind that the story alone, even if fairly woodenly written and played, was enough to catch my interest and even tug at my heart a bit, I was able to enjoy how very beautiful Hayden and Natalie are, how dead she was going to end up and how disfigured and inwardly destroyed he was going to end up, how fantastically Alec Guinness played the older, weary Obi-Wan, his wisdom hard-won from years in the desert - who knew, back in 1977, that he'd turn out to have been so impulsive as a young Jedi? Makes you see his exhortations to Luke to be calm, be patient, let go, in a whole new light.
All right then. I return to my first statement: I wish I could have been eleven while I watched this movie; I would have been more credulous, certainly, but also more forgiving. Those of us who grew up with Star Wars have expected each episode to grow up with us. When I was a pre-teen, Star Wars was just right: black and white, good and evil with the good guys always winning in the end, never ever by cheating. The Empire Strikes Back hit in the fullness of my teens, getting the hook in good and deep about scoundrels: my first marriage might owe something to that darn conflicted Han Solo. Return of the Jedi reached me as I was graduating from high school, blurring the lines between right and wrong but still ending happily (all too happily, with those foolish teddy bears. Oh well).
But Episode I didn't come about for another sixteen years. Lucas made the right decision as a moneymaker to address it to a new generation of fans, keeping some character and story continuity to appease us oldsters, but in essence, it was aimed at the teenage me instead of the wife-and-mother-and-career-woman me. Was it the right decision as a filmmaker? Who am I to say? Because here's the thing: for all my pretensions, I couldn't have written this screenplay. It may be unsubtle and, at base, classically derivative upon analysis, but I couldn't have conceived of this as a solution to the threefold problems I mentioned a few paragraphs up. As Yoda might (but wouldn't) put it, smart am I, but create something such as this, I could not.
1 comment:
Jamie,
For two people who respectfully disagree so often, I don't know what to say. Your post is some sort of Jedi-mind trick--putting onto the screen the contents of my entire thoughts on this new movie.
I saw it for the second time yesterday...a matinee this time, where I could drink in the effects, and look for details I missed at the midnight showing.
I enjoyed the movie, if not but for the closure it provided. I think it was the most emotional of the series, where Lucas actually decided that dialogue wasn't always neccessary to convey feelings.
Even given the sadness of the movie, it was still funny. To the fully realized robot slapstick of R2-D2 to the cackling menace of the Palpatine, we were finally watching the characters we both grew up with unfettered.
As I wrote in Jane's blog, what was missing the pre-quels was that sense of fun, primarily provided by Harrison Ford's "Han Solo." I mean, here was one guy, throughout all science fiction that we earthlings could easily relate to.
I think everybody knows a cocky drifter on the wrong side of the law, with a suped up old vehicle, full of himself, always in trouble but will do the right thing in the end, albeit reluctantly. Two, Solo wasn't weighed down with the Jedi/Sith/Political/Millitary/Alien mumbo-jumbo metaphysics dialogue that every other character in the Star Wars galaxy was infected with. According to interviews, Ford would fight to change scripts, including the best line in the entire series, where he's being frozen into carbonite in Empire.
When Leia says, "I love you", the script calls for Solo to say, "I love you, too". Fortunately, Ford had the good sense, and good spine to trash the line and give that legendary 70's pimp-reading--
"I know."
Han also made fun of the force, ("hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid.")
It was needed, because Jedi were essentially asexual, monk-like beings who are sworn not to make attatchments. In other words, they really wouldn't be all that much fun to hang out with.
And lets face it, guys wanted to be Han Solo, and all my gal pals wanted to be WITH Han Solo. But I will give props to Hayden Christensen in Episode III, for the first Star Wars washboard abs.
(You're correct that Leia stopped doing that as well, into the Episode IV, but she had already established that "valedictorian/class president" character already.)
Luke's spoke like a typical angst ridden teen at first, wanting to go with his friends to the academy instead of chores. Slowly he turned into Jedi speak as well...
"I shant leave you here to die.."
--ROTJ
Maybe it's my old age, but my friends always talk about that steel bikini Leia wore in "Jedi", so there was that element of eye candy there. It was "legal" to look at Carrie Fisher that way, as opposed to Natalie Portman in the first two prequels.
You'll probably be disappointed in Episode II, because it's the "filler episode" in my opinion. And it's probably the worst example of Lucas getting creature happy with his CGI.
--Cobra
Post a Comment